I recently came across an article about how more people in India are starting to
eat meat. The article attributed this trend to a general growing financial
prosperity in that country. This came as a surprise to a lot of people since, as
many of you already know, India is one of the world's bastions for vegetarianism,
with an estimated 40% or more of its population being vegetarian. Still, while the
phenomenon is an unfortunate one, it is understandable.
In many parts of Asia, meat consumption was relatively low because meat was
expensive. It was reserved for special occasions. In places like China, where
many are benefiting from economic prosperity, meat consumption is up, because
many people can now afford it. This phenomenon has very little to do with
ethics, and much more to do with economics. I, for example, have attained a
higher level of empathy for other animals, so I'm not going to start eating meat
no matter how much more money I'd make. On the other hand, a person who
normally would eat meat anyway, but simply didn't have the means to do this on
a regular basis, would benefit from his new-found wealth to consume more meat.
It becomes important, then, in societies where meat consumption is on the rise,
to actively teach (and remind) people that the lives of sentient beings like pigs,
cows, chickens, fish, etc., should be respected. An increase in wealth does not
have to mean an increase in violence towards other species. Theoretically, this
should strike a chord in countries which already have a strong tradition of tasty
and healthy vegetarian alternatives. It's great that some people can enjoy life
more, but it's important that animals should be given an opportunity to enjoy
their lives as well.
So what about the increase in meat consumption in a country like India, a
country with such a strong tradition of vegetarianism? First, the fact that 40% of
India is vegetarian obviously means that about 60% of its citizens are not
vegetarian, which means that quite a lot of people do eat meat. Second, a lot of
the vegetarianism in India is based on religion, primarily Hinduism, but also
Jainism and (some schools of) Buddhism. Like anywhere else in the world,
people are often born into a religion, and follow it because of family tradition,
etc. In this case, they are born into vegetarianism. While I think this is very
positive, it doesn't automatically guarantee a deep empathy (or even respect) for
animals. Some will develop this, and some won't. As I've written before, anyone
who hasn't attained a higher level of empathy for animals, can quite easily fall
(back) into eating meat. Once you get to the state where you realize that all
sentient life must be respected, it's pretty hard to go back to a less enlightened
way of treating other animals, including eating them.
No comments:
Post a Comment